How to Use This Comparison

This table compares the publicly reported equity portfolios of Rhode Island investment advisors using standardized financial and valuation metrics.

Each row represents one advisor. Each column shows an objective portfolio characteristic derived from SEC filings.
Higher valuation multiples and higher concentration levels generally indicate greater sensitivity to changes in market expectations.

This table does not rate or rank advisors and does not make recommendations.
Use it to compare advisors side-by-side.

Portfolio Size & Concentration Valuation Exposure Balance Sheet Risk Income & Growth
# 13F AUM 13F # of Holdings % in Top 10 Most Held Sector % in Most Held Sector Avg. Price to Sales Avg. Price to Earnings Avg. Price to Tan. Equity Avg. Price to FCF Avg. Debt to Revenue Avg. Debt to Tan. Equity Avg. Current Ratio Avg. Dividend Yield Avg. Annual. 5-Yr Rev. Growth
1 $1,089,010,000 145 53% Technology 33% 7.9 30 15.2 29.2 1.5 8.3 1.9 1.1% 15.4%
2 $151,268,907 34 66% Technology 42% 9.7 34.2 15.6 43.9 1.2 6.3 1.9 1.1% 12.9%
3 $208,183,000 70 40% Technology 22% 5.7 27.3 14.7 26.1 2.4 11.6 1.5 1.9% 9.3%
4 $520,638,000 290 66% Financials 68% 5.1 10 6.7 43.1 1.8 3.7 5.4 0.5% 9.6%
5 $1,390,620,878 220 41% Technology 30% 7.5 30.4 15 28.7 2.1 9.4 1.6 1.2% 14.6%
6 $1,095,930,769 179 60% Financials 29% 2.3 -116.8 6 15.8 3 6.5 2.3 2.3% 10.0%
7 $492,525,307 202 47% Technology 34% 8.7 32.2 14.9 28.6 1.9 7.4 1.8 1.1% 18.7%
8 $3,047,848,129 278 34% Technology 33% 7.9 31.7 16 27.1 1.7 10.3 1.6 1.6% 14.4%
9 $463,072,552 200 41% Technology 36% 7.9 28.3 15.3 27.7 2 9.4 1.6 1.3% 14.1%
10 $253,637,858 98 45% Technology 23% 6.8 30.6 14.9 31.5 2.2 9.7 1.5 1.6% 10.5%
11 $291,685,708 659 40% Technology 35% 8.2 22.9 13.6 27.9 2.3 7 2.2 1.3% 19.9%
12 $268,198,585 86 66% Technology 52% 9.6 35.8 16 41.9 0.9 5.5 1.6 0.6% 17.8%
13 $931,796,472 407 41% Technology 39% 9.4 33.9 15.5 29.2 1.6 7.1 2 0.9% 19.7%
14 $278,070,330 98 47% Technology 42% 8.3 -120.1 15.1 40.1 2.1 8.3 1.3 0.9% 11.0%
15 $170,859,112 162 28% Technology 36% 7.1 26.2 13.9 33.3 2.6 7.5 1.6 1.9% 13.3%
16 $309,772,457 35 61% Industrials 41% 4.4 25.1 10.8 26.2 2.5 7.6 2.4 1.4% 12.1%
17 $1,076,624,406 96 31% Technology 23% 6.4 29.1 14.3 28.9 1.9 10.7 1.3 2.1% 10.5%
18 $7,300,615,203 817 35% Technology 33% 8.1 26.9 14.8 31 2.3 9.1 1.7 1.4% 16.0%
19 $248,570,555 30 24% Technology 21% 6.7 22.8 13.5 26.6 2.2 9.4 1.8 1.7% 13.2%
20 $73,226,000 143 39% Technology 33% 7.9 30 15.2 29.3 1.4 8.3 1.9 1.1% 15.5%
21 $308,191,615 173 35% Technology 41% 7.4 20.8 15.7 32.8 1.7 8.7 1.4 1.7% 13.1%
22 $169,074,999 10 100% Financials 76% 4.1 24.5 10.8 36.4 4.9 10.8 2.2 7.5% 0.3%
23 $389,637,416 785 27% Technology 19% 6.4 27.5 14.1 24.6 2.3 9.5 1.8 1.7% 11.4%
24 $287,364,665 40 74% Technology 58% 11.7 32.7 17.5 40.4 1 6 2.5 0.7% 32.2%
25 $218,222,079 48 93% Financials 47% 7.9 31.7 16 27.1 1.7 10.3 1.6 1.6% 14.4%
26 $882,601,254 124 40% Technology 51% 9.8 32.9 17.2 35.5 1.8 7.5 2.7 0.8% 18.2%
27 $583,590,779 3 100% Cons. Disc. 35% 1.6 19.3 8.7 15.1 1.4 9.3 2.3 1.4% 9.5%
28 $636,081,213 148 57% Technology 48% 11.3 31.2 16.2 34.5 1.3 5.8 2.1 0.7% 24.4%
29 $222,006,529 328 46% Technology 32% 7.2 29 13.9 26.1 2.8 8.7 1.7 1.4% 13.8%
30 $1,759,780,639 468 32% Technology 28% 6.4 25.5 14.2 27.8 1.9 9.3 1.8 1.4% 10.2%
31 $442,820,669 226 33% Technology 28% 6.9 28.8 14.4 23 2.8 10.7 1.5 1.7% 12.8%
32 $178,259,000 27 89% Technology 86% 11.9 39.6 20 40.2 0.7 5.5 1.5 0.6% 18.9%
33 $125,367,835 129 52% Health Care 23% 3.9 24.5 12.3 27.4 2.5 10.3 1 3.0% 5.4%